https://www.wikicu.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=NewyorkerWikiCU - User contributions [en]2026-05-06T19:51:35ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.31.8https://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Talk:Five_pillars_theory&diff=12712Talk:Five pillars theory2007-05-04T01:50:26Z<p>Newyorker: </p>
<hr />
<div>== Nomination for Deletion ==<br />
*'''Delete/Move''' - Or at the very least move to the ''failed attempt at Humor'' category [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 13:33, 1 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
*'''Keep''' - I think it's an interesting theory, though of course it's entirely unoriginal and Tao is rather pompous in claiming it as his own. Nevertheless, I agree that it's in the wrong category. I propose we move it to new "[[:Category:Opinions|opinions]]", "editorials", or "opinion pieces" category. Personally, I'd appreciate such a category as an outlet for my occasional "[http://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Undergraduate_business_program&curid=3229&diff=12455&oldid=12442 editorializing rhetoric]". {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:19, 1 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
*'''Delete''' [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 17:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
*'''Move''' - it can go under [[Tao Tan]], possibly [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 18:32, 1 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
*'''Keep'''' This isn't wikipedia, so pet theories are fair game. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 17:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
*'''Keep'''+'''Move''' Can we put it under a category like "student pontifications and masturbations"?[[User:Stephen.wang|wang]] 22:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
*'''Onanism''': i think we need to make an 'onanism' template, and this can be the first (of many) proud recipients.[[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 13:49, 3 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
:*Excellent suggestion! Although a category would be more appropriate than a template. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:04, 3 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Since when is Amherst a university?'''</div>Newyorkerhttps://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Talk:Five_pillars_theory&diff=12711Talk:Five pillars theory2007-05-04T01:49:40Z<p>Newyorker: </p>
<hr />
<div>== Nomination for Deletion ==<br />
*'''Delete/Move''' - Or at the very least move to the ''failed attempt at Humor'' category [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 13:33, 1 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
*'''Keep''' - I think it's an interesting theory, though of course it's entirely unoriginal and Tao is rather pompous in claiming it as his own. Nevertheless, I agree that it's in the wrong category. I propose we move it to new "[[:Category:Opinions|opinions]]", "editorials", or "opinion pieces" category. Personally, I'd appreciate such a category as an outlet for my occasional "[http://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Undergraduate_business_program&curid=3229&diff=12455&oldid=12442 editorializing rhetoric]". {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:19, 1 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
*'''Delete''' [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 17:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
*'''Move''' - it can go under [[Tao Tan]], possibly [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 18:32, 1 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
*'''Keep'''' This isn't wikipedia, so pet theories are fair game. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 17:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
*'''Keep'''+'''Move''' Can we put it under a category like "student pontifications and masturbations"?[[User:Stephen.wang|wang]] 22:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
*'''Onanism''': i think we need to make an 'onanism' template, and this can be the first (of many) proud recipients.[[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 13:49, 3 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
:*Excellent suggestion! Although a category would be more appropriate than a template. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:04, 3 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
<br />
Since when is Amherst a university?</div>Newyorker