WikiCU - User contributions [en]

User talk:Weknowabtthat

2007-06-14T15:52:42Z

Weknowabtthat:

Please don't post attacks on people. Or, if you must post attacks on people, please do so in a way that is remotely humorous. --[[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 15:28, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

:* Thank you, Nonsensical. We really take your opinion on humour highly. Please go to the page, Edward Beaulac, for more laughs. PS. You're next! Hugs and kisses.
::"We"? It saddens me that it took more than one person to think of an edit that stupid. Anyway, if you make another attack page, your account will be blocked. Hugs and Kisses right back atcha. --[[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 15:45, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

I have to admit, I'm flattered. [[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] 20:36, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
::* Why don't you guys follow your own rules? From the WikiCU help page:
" Complaints about an article

Wikipedia doesn't censor content. Neither does WikiCU. Occasionally someone will post stuff that others don't like. This might include slander or unnecessarily personal information. You are welcome to remove this content yourself by editing the article."

:I guess that rule is a bit misleading, but it is true. The maintainers of WikiCU are fairly hands off on censoring content, but the admins are just regular users who happen to participate a lot and were given extra rights. I wouldn't quite call the [[Erica Jackson]] or [[Matt Sanchez]] pages "attack pages". They're about people who are notoriously disliked on campus and part of wikicu is reflecting campus sentiment. The difference between the Jackson/Sanchez pages and what you posted is that those pages are factual, whereas yours is purely opinion and does not demonstrate any relevance to anyone in the student body besides you and the person you're attacking. I wouldn't delete something just because I don't think it's funny (though I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone that thought what you wrote was funny). --[[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 13:01, 13 June 2007 (EDT)

:* I would beg to differ with your statement regarding the "factual" statements you've posted about Erica Jackson, Matt Sanchez, and countless other controversial pages on this website. Frequently there are articles you've written that bear NO citations, but rather tout your subjective and rather erroneous opinions about the Columbia community. It's "funny" that you frequently seem to find yourself exempt from the rules that you purportedly support, as an admin, but have no problem deleting pages that don't fit some esoteric underlying objective you seem to be furthering with every article you write. You clearly socialize in different circles [if at all] if you believe Sanchez and Jackson to be more infamous on the Columbia campus than Beaulac; perhaps you should diversify content and maintain strictly factual articles if you intend to oversee a site that is useful to someone other than the four or five of you who are so clearly invested in this piece of shit.

User talk:Nonsensical

2007-06-13T14:14:11Z

Weknowabtthat:

{{prezbo|For your many excellent contributions!<br/>{{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 20:15, 19 May 2007 (EDT)}}

I rolled back your removal of Tao Tan's credit on a number of articles. This isn't Wikipedia and there's never been any explicit agreement to assume we follow Wikipedia policies. Several administrators felt that Tao deserved credit as the articles represent his original research. Regarding NPOV, pet theories, etc., these are allowed here. We can discuss these policies and specific articles (on talk pages) but do not assume wikipedia rules. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 17:22, 2 May 2007 (EDT)

Why don't you follow your own rules?

From the WikiCU help page:
" Complaints about an article

Wikipedia doesn't censor content. Neither does WikiCU. Occasionally someone will post stuff that others don't like. This might include slander or unnecessarily personal information. You are welcome to remove this content yourself by editing the article."

How can you just delete a created page. And why do admins get to dictate what is funny? The Matt Sanchez page and Erica Jackson page aren't very funny and they seem like attack pages as well. Why aren't those deleted but pages that are about admins are? It's not fair and you guys don't even play by your own rules.

User talk:Weknowabtthat

2007-06-13T14:09:26Z

Weknowabtthat:

User talk:Weknowabtthat

2007-06-11T19:39:01Z

Weknowabtthat:

User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat

2007-06-11T19:01:55Z

Weknowabtthat:

My name is Eddie Beaulac. And I am a prestigious member of the Columbia College Class of 2008. I am also the eloquent author of [http://eternalmiserablesuffering.blogspot.com Eternal, Miserable Suffering] and a member of [[Pi Kappa Alpha]]. Pike is uber cool. We have lots of parties and I get very drunk. My blog is really awesome too. You should read it. I make fun of fat chicks even though I, myself, fluctuate between "chubby" and "obese" (or at least that is what my doctor tells me). I like making fun of people that are in cooler frats than I am and hate Barnard girls (even though they are the only ones who obey) and women in general, especially women drivers. They are stupid!!! Hahahahahaha. If men didn't have penises I think I would prefer having sex with them seeing as how much I hate dem hoes. But, I mean, I've always been one for the back door anyway (Hey, Kosdan, why haven't you called?) Here is a flattering photo of me and my amazing bod.

[[Image:fatmano.jpg]]