Talk:CUSJ-Jester Feud - Revision history

Nonsensical at 21:54, 30 April 2007

2007-04-30T21:54:06Z

Reaganaut at 12:01, 30 April 2007

2007-04-30T12:01:09Z

Umlund at 11:54, 30 April 2007

2007-04-30T11:54:24Z

WhatYouKnowAboutThat: New page: It probably doesn't need to be said, but should there be any information here regarding whether or not there ACTUALLY is a feud? ~~~~

2007-04-30T05:05:06Z

New page: It probably doesn't need to be said, but should there be any information here regarding whether or not there ACTUALLY is a feud? ~~~~

New page

It probably doesn't need to be said, but should there be any information here regarding whether or not there ACTUALLY is a feud? [[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] 01:05, 30 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 30 April 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:Agreed. Only trouble is that I can't be bothered editing it - the feud really is ''that'' boring! {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 08:01, 30 April 2007 (EDT)		:Agreed. Only trouble is that I can't be bothered editing it - the feud really is ''that'' boring! {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 08:01, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	::Re-edited it to try to be more neutral in accusations. [[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 17:54, 30 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 30 April 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Almost every verb in this article needs to be changed; it's clear that this is all being done by Jester, yet this article uses verbs indicating that CUSJ has actually admitted to everything. The statement of quite so many speculations as fact is rather glaring and, given that this whole topic seems to be one which has been promulgated almost solely by anonymous postings and wiki-vandalisms, i'd like to suggest it be edited to reflect that noone has admitted to anything, that the only declarative statments anyone can make is who has been accused of what by whom, and that the page be locked. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 07:54, 30 April 2007 (EDT)		Almost every verb in this article needs to be changed; it's clear that this is all being done by Jester, yet this article uses verbs indicating that CUSJ has actually admitted to everything. The statement of quite so many speculations as fact is rather glaring and, given that this whole topic seems to be one which has been promulgated almost solely by anonymous postings and wiki-vandalisms, i'd like to suggest it be edited to reflect that noone has admitted to anything, that the only declarative statments anyone can make is who has been accused of what by whom, and that the page be locked. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 07:54, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	:Agreed. Only trouble is that I can't be bothered editing it - the feud really is ''that'' boring! {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 08:01, 30 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:54, 30 April 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	It probably doesn't need to be said, but should there be any information here regarding whether or not there ACTUALLY is a feud? [[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat\|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] 01:05, 30 April 2007 (EDT)		It probably doesn't need to be said, but should there be any information here regarding whether or not there ACTUALLY is a feud? [[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat\|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] 01:05, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	Almost every verb in this article needs to be changed; it's clear that this is all being done by Jester, yet this article uses verbs indicating that CUSJ has actually admitted to everything. The statement of quite so many speculations as fact is rather glaring and, given that this whole topic seems to be one which has been promulgated almost solely by anonymous postings and wiki-vandalisms, i'd like to suggest it be edited to reflect that noone has admitted to anything, that the only declarative statments anyone can make is who has been accused of what by whom, and that the page be locked. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 07:54, 30 April 2007 (EDT)