Talk:Five pillars theory - Revision history

Newyorker at 01:50, 4 May 2007

2007-05-04T01:50:26Z

Newyorker at 01:49, 4 May 2007

2007-05-04T01:49:40Z

Reaganaut at 18:04, 3 May 2007

2007-05-03T18:04:43Z

Umlund at 17:49, 3 May 2007

2007-05-03T17:49:15Z

Umlund at 17:48, 3 May 2007

2007-05-03T17:48:49Z

Stephen.wang at 02:06, 3 May 2007

2007-05-03T02:06:36Z

Feinstein: /* Nomination for Deletion */

2007-05-02T21:14:54Z

‎Nomination for Deletion

Pacman at 22:32, 1 May 2007

2007-05-01T22:32:51Z

Nonsensical at 22:08, 1 May 2007

2007-05-01T22:08:47Z

Umlund at 21:59, 1 May 2007

2007-05-01T21:59:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:50, 4 May 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:


−	Since when is Amherst a university?	+	'''Since when is Amherst a university?'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 4 May 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	*'''Onanism''': i think we need to make an 'onanism' template, and this can be the first (of many) proud recipients.[[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 13:49, 3 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Onanism''': i think we need to make an 'onanism' template, and this can be the first (of many) proud recipients.[[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 13:49, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
	:*Excellent suggestion! Although a category would be more appropriate than a template. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:04, 3 May 2007 (EDT)		:*Excellent suggestion! Although a category would be more appropriate than a template. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:04, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+
		+	Since when is Amherst a university?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:04, 3 May 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*'''Keep'''+'''Move''' Can we put it under a category like "student pontifications and masturbations"?[[User:Stephen.wang\|wang]] 22:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Keep'''+'''Move''' Can we put it under a category like "student pontifications and masturbations"?[[User:Stephen.wang\|wang]] 22:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
	*'''Onanism''': i think we need to make an 'onanism' template, and this can be the first (of many) proud recipients.[[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 13:49, 3 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Onanism''': i think we need to make an 'onanism' template, and this can be the first (of many) proud recipients.[[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 13:49, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	:*Excellent suggestion! Although a category would be more appropriate than a template. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:04, 3 May 2007 (EDT)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 *'''Keep'''' This isn't wikipedia, so pet theories are fair game. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 17:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
 *'''Keep'''+'''Move''' Can we put it under a category like "student pontifications and masturbations"?[[User:Stephen.wang|wang]] 22:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
-*'''Onanism''': i think we need to make an 'onanism' template, and this can be the first (of many) proud recipients.
+*'''Onanism''': i think we need to make an 'onanism' template, and this can be the first (of many) proud recipients.[[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 13:49, 3 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:48, 3 May 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*'''Keep'''' This isn't wikipedia, so pet theories are fair game. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 17:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Keep'''' This isn't wikipedia, so pet theories are fair game. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 17:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
	*'''Keep'''+'''Move''' Can we put it under a category like "student pontifications and masturbations"?[[User:Stephen.wang\|wang]] 22:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Keep'''+'''Move''' Can we put it under a category like "student pontifications and masturbations"?[[User:Stephen.wang\|wang]] 22:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	*'''Onanism''': i think we need to make an 'onanism' template, and this can be the first (of many) proud recipients.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 3 May 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*'''Move''' - it can go under [[Tao Tan]], possibly [[User:Pacman\|Pacman]] 18:32, 1 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Move''' - it can go under [[Tao Tan]], possibly [[User:Pacman\|Pacman]] 18:32, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
	*'''Keep'''' This isn't wikipedia, so pet theories are fair game. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 17:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Keep'''' This isn't wikipedia, so pet theories are fair game. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 17:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	*'''Keep'''+'''Move''' Can we put it under a category like "student pontifications and masturbations"?[[User:Stephen.wang\|wang]] 22:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 2 May 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	*'''Delete''' [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 17:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Delete''' [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 17:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
	*'''Move''' - it can go under [[Tao Tan]], possibly [[User:Pacman\|Pacman]] 18:32, 1 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Move''' - it can go under [[Tao Tan]], possibly [[User:Pacman\|Pacman]] 18:32, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	*'''Keep'''' This isn't wikipedia, so pet theories are fair game. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 17:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:32, 1 May 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	*'''Keep''' - I think it's an interesting theory, though of course it's entirely unoriginal and Tao is rather pompous in claiming it as his own. Nevertheless, I agree that it's in the wrong category. I propose we move it to new "[[:Category:Opinions\|opinions]]", "editorials", or "opinion pieces" category. Personally, I'd appreciate such a category as an outlet for my occasional "[http://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Undergraduate_business_program&curid=3229&diff=12455&oldid=12442 editorializing rhetoric]". {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:19, 1 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Keep''' - I think it's an interesting theory, though of course it's entirely unoriginal and Tao is rather pompous in claiming it as his own. Nevertheless, I agree that it's in the wrong category. I propose we move it to new "[[:Category:Opinions\|opinions]]", "editorials", or "opinion pieces" category. Personally, I'd appreciate such a category as an outlet for my occasional "[http://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Undergraduate_business_program&curid=3229&diff=12455&oldid=12442 editorializing rhetoric]". {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:19, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
	*'''Delete''' [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 17:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Delete''' [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 17:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	*'''Move''' - it can go under [[Tao Tan]], possibly [[User:Pacman\|Pacman]] 18:32, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Nomination for Deletion ==
-*'''Delete''' - Or at the very least move to the ''failed attempt at Humor'' category [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 13:33, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
+*'''Delete/Move''' - Or at the very least move to the ''failed attempt at Humor'' category [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 13:33, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
 *'''Keep''' - I think it's an interesting theory, though of course it's entirely unoriginal and Tao is rather pompous in claiming it as his own. Nevertheless, I agree that it's in the wrong category. I propose we move it to new "[[:Category:Opinions|opinions]]", "editorials", or "opinion pieces" category. Personally, I'd appreciate such a category as an outlet for my occasional "[http://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Undergraduate_business_program&curid=3229&diff=12455&oldid=12442 editorializing rhetoric]". {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:19, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
-*""Delete"" [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 17:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
+*'''Delete''' [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 17:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:59, 1 May 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	*'''Delete''' - Or at the very least move to the ''failed attempt at Humor'' category [[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 13:33, 1 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Delete''' - Or at the very least move to the ''failed attempt at Humor'' category [[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 13:33, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
	*'''Keep''' - I think it's an interesting theory, though of course it's entirely unoriginal and Tao is rather pompous in claiming it as his own. Nevertheless, I agree that it's in the wrong category. I propose we move it to new "[[:Category:Opinions\|opinions]]", "editorials", or "opinion pieces" category. Personally, I'd appreciate such a category as an outlet for my occasional "[http://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Undergraduate_business_program&curid=3229&diff=12455&oldid=12442 editorializing rhetoric]". {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:19, 1 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Keep''' - I think it's an interesting theory, though of course it's entirely unoriginal and Tao is rather pompous in claiming it as his own. Nevertheless, I agree that it's in the wrong category. I propose we move it to new "[[:Category:Opinions\|opinions]]", "editorials", or "opinion pieces" category. Personally, I'd appreciate such a category as an outlet for my occasional "[http://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Undergraduate_business_program&curid=3229&diff=12455&oldid=12442 editorializing rhetoric]". {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:19, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	*""Delete"" [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 17:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)