Talk:Gabriel Morris - Revision history

Nonsensical at 16:31, 12 May 2007

2007-05-12T16:31:22Z

Nonsensical at 15:09, 9 May 2007

2007-05-09T15:09:18Z

Reaganaut at 07:28, 9 May 2007

2007-05-09T07:28:01Z

WhatYouKnowAboutThat at 05:31, 9 May 2007

2007-05-09T05:31:16Z

WhatYouKnowAboutThat at 05:30, 9 May 2007

2007-05-09T05:30:59Z

Stephen.wang at 02:52, 9 May 2007

2007-05-09T02:52:16Z

Reaganaut at 14:17, 4 May 2007

2007-05-04T14:17:58Z

Nonsensical at 13:53, 4 May 2007

2007-05-04T13:53:34Z

Reaganaut at 07:22, 4 May 2007

2007-05-04T07:22:31Z

Umlund: New page: '''Delete''' --- created as an attack page, presumably as part of the unending jester's cusj campaign. not cool. also exceedingly goddamned tedious. ~~~~

2007-05-04T06:52:35Z

New page: '''Delete''' --- created as an attack page, presumably as part of the unending jester's cusj campaign. not cool. also exceedingly goddamned tedious. ~~~~

New page

'''Delete''' --- created as an attack page, presumably as part of the unending jester's cusj campaign. not cool. also exceedingly goddamned tedious. [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 02:52, 4 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:31, 12 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	== Nomination for Deletion ==	+	== Nomination for Deletion (archived on 5/12/07) ==
		+	===Decision: Keep===

	*'''Delete''' --- created as an attack page, presumably as part of the unending jester's cusj campaign. not cool. also exceedingly goddamned tedious. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 02:52, 4 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Delete''' --- created as an attack page, presumably as part of the unending jester's cusj campaign. not cool. also exceedingly goddamned tedious. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 02:52, 4 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:09, 9 May 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*'''Keep''' - I think it's ok... 22:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Keep''' - I think it's ok... 22:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
	*'''Delete''' - Is it really necessary to have a page for every EiC of every campus publication? Spec, Fed, and B&W editors make sense, but is the CUSJ readership really wide enough for its staff to be considered notable?[[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat\|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] 01:31, 9 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Delete''' - Is it really necessary to have a page for every EiC of every campus publication? Spec, Fed, and B&W editors make sense, but is the CUSJ readership really wide enough for its staff to be considered notable?[[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat\|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] 01:31, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	:I agree with you, I don't think being CUSJ EiC is that big a deal, but I think a lot of people now know his name because of the CUSJ-Jester feud, so he's notable. [[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 11:09, 9 May 2007 (EDT)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 *'''Delete''' --- created as an attack page, presumably as part of the unending jester's cusj campaign. not cool. also exceedingly goddamned tedious. [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 02:52, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
-*'''Delete''' - in fact, I think this kind of thing should qualify for 'speedy deletion'. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 03:22, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
+*<s>'''Delete''' - in fact, I think this kind of thing should qualify for 'speedy deletion'. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 03:22, 4 May 2007 (EDT)</s>
 *'''Keep''' - I think it's been cleaned up and is now fine [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 09:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
 *'''Keep''' - I think it's ok... 22:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 *'''Delete''' - Is it really necessary to have a page for every EiC of every campus publication?  Spec, Fed, and B&W editors make sense, but is the CUSJ readership really wide enough for its staff to be considered notable?[[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] 01:31, 9 May 2007 (EDT)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 *'''Keep''' - I think it's been cleaned up and is now fine [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 09:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
 *'''Keep''' - I think it's ok... 22:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
-*'''Delete''' - Is it really necessary to have a page for every EiC of every campus publication?  Spec, Fed, and B&W editors make sense, but is the CUSJ readership really wide enough for its staff to be considered notable?
+*'''Delete''' - Is it really necessary to have a page for every EiC of every campus publication?  Spec, Fed, and B&W editors make sense, but is the CUSJ readership really wide enough for its staff to be considered notable?[[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] 01:31, 9 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:30, 9 May 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*'''Keep''' - I think it's been cleaned up and is now fine [[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 09:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Keep''' - I think it's been cleaned up and is now fine [[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 09:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
	*'''Keep''' - I think it's ok... 22:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Keep''' - I think it's ok... 22:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	*'''Delete''' - Is it really necessary to have a page for every EiC of every campus publication? Spec, Fed, and B&W editors make sense, but is the CUSJ readership really wide enough for its staff to be considered notable?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 9 May 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	*'''Delete''' - in fact, I think this kind of thing should qualify for 'speedy deletion'. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 03:22, 4 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Delete''' - in fact, I think this kind of thing should qualify for 'speedy deletion'. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 03:22, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
	*'''Keep''' - I think it's been cleaned up and is now fine [[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 09:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Keep''' - I think it's been cleaned up and is now fine [[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 09:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	*'''Keep''' - I think it's ok... 22:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 4 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Nomination for Deletion ==
		+
	'''Delete''' --- created as an attack page, presumably as part of the unending jester's cusj campaign. not cool. also exceedingly goddamned tedious. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 02:52, 4 May 2007 (EDT)		'''Delete''' --- created as an attack page, presumably as part of the unending jester's cusj campaign. not cool. also exceedingly goddamned tedious. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 02:52, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
	:'''Delete''' - in fact, I think this kind of thing should qualify for 'speedy deletion'. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 03:22, 4 May 2007 (EDT)		:'''Delete''' - in fact, I think this kind of thing should qualify for 'speedy deletion'. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 03:22, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	*'''Keep''' - I think it's been cleaned up and is now fine [[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 09:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:22, 4 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Delete''' --- created as an attack page, presumably as part of the unending jester's cusj campaign. not cool. also exceedingly goddamned tedious. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 02:52, 4 May 2007 (EDT)		'''Delete''' --- created as an attack page, presumably as part of the unending jester's cusj campaign. not cool. also exceedingly goddamned tedious. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 02:52, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	:'''Delete''' - in fact, I think this kind of thing should qualify for 'speedy deletion'. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 03:22, 4 May 2007 (EDT)