Talk:Jeff Julian (character) - Revision history

Reaganaut at 04:44, 6 March 2008

2008-03-06T04:44:10Z

2008-03-04T16:28:31Z

2008-03-04T05:02:04Z

2008-03-04T03:25:25Z

2008-03-03T06:52:15Z

2008-03-03T05:25:29Z

2008-03-03T05:11:27Z

2008-03-03T03:57:42Z

2008-02-29T01:45:12Z

‎Nomination for deletion

2008-02-28T20:22:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 6 March 2008
Line 31:		Line 31:
	=== Merged ===		=== Merged ===
	I think the consensus among users who had actually registered an account and made contributions was pretty clearly to merge this in with the Jeff Julian (person) article. Alternatively, it could still be moved to the Up Late page if that seems more appropriate. Still, no reason to delete the content (which was funny and nicely written) altogether.		I think the consensus among users who had actually registered an account and made contributions was pretty clearly to merge this in with the Jeff Julian (person) article. Alternatively, it could still be moved to the Up Late page if that seems more appropriate. Still, no reason to delete the content (which was funny and nicely written) altogether.
		+
		+	=== Change of plan ===
		+	See here: http://www.wikicu.com/Talk:Jeff_Julian
		+	{{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 23:44, 5 March 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:28, 4 March 2008
Line 28:		Line 28:

	MERGE - Seriously. [[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 00:02, 4 March 2008 (EST)		MERGE - Seriously. [[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 00:02, 4 March 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	=== Merged ===
		+	I think the consensus among users who had actually registered an account and made contributions was pretty clearly to merge this in with the Jeff Julian (person) article. Alternatively, it could still be moved to the Up Late page if that seems more appropriate. Still, no reason to delete the content (which was funny and nicely written) altogether.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:02, 4 March 2008
Line 26:		Line 26:

	* Hmmm, I can't help but wonder whether all the above votes were left by the same person! {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 01:52, 3 March 2008 (EST)		* Hmmm, I can't help but wonder whether all the above votes were left by the same person! {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 01:52, 3 March 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	MERGE - Seriously. [[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 00:02, 4 March 2008 (EST)

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 KEEP - why the fuck not?
-KEEP - Deleting this would be a shame.  If an article for the show itself arises, it would seem complimentary.  If it is to be deleted, at least MERGE it with the show's article.
+KEEP - Deleting this would be a shame.  If an article for the show itself arises, it would seem complimentary.  If it is to be deleted, at least MERGE it with the show's article.  --[[User:Pepto|Pepto]] 22:25, 3 March 2008 (EST)
 KEEP - This is a funny article, and is something which is a credit to WikiCU. Deleting it would benefit nobody.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:52, 3 March 2008
Line 24:		Line 24:

	KEEP - I agree with the comment above me. WikiCU needs some more humor, especially when wikipedia has tons of articles on fictional characters.		KEEP - I agree with the comment above me. WikiCU needs some more humor, especially when wikipedia has tons of articles on fictional characters.
		+
		+	* Hmmm, I can't help but wonder whether all the above votes were left by the same person! {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 01:52, 3 March 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:25, 3 March 2008
Line 22:		Line 22:

	KEEP - This is a funny article, and is something which is a credit to WikiCU. Deleting it would benefit nobody.		KEEP - This is a funny article, and is something which is a credit to WikiCU. Deleting it would benefit nobody.
		+
		+	KEEP - I agree with the comment above me. WikiCU needs some more humor, especially when wikipedia has tons of articles on fictional characters.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 3 March 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:

	KEEP - Deleting this would be a shame. If an article for the show itself arises, it would seem complimentary. If it is to be deleted, at least MERGE it with the show's article.		KEEP - Deleting this would be a shame. If an article for the show itself arises, it would seem complimentary. If it is to be deleted, at least MERGE it with the show's article.
		+
		+	KEEP - This is a funny article, and is something which is a credit to WikiCU. Deleting it would benefit nobody.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:57, 3 March 2008
Line 18:		Line 18:

	KEEP - why the fuck not?		KEEP - why the fuck not?
		+
		+	KEEP - Deleting this would be a shame. If an article for the show itself arises, it would seem complimentary. If it is to be deleted, at least MERGE it with the show's article.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:45, 29 February 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:

	MERGE - it would be fine if folded into the JJ (person) article, but this is wasteful. Steven Colbert is a longtime character; this appears to be advertising for a one time event. [[User:Pacman\|Pacman]] 15:22, 28 February 2008 (EST)		MERGE - it would be fine if folded into the JJ (person) article, but this is wasteful. Steven Colbert is a longtime character; this appears to be advertising for a one time event. [[User:Pacman\|Pacman]] 15:22, 28 February 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	KEEP - why the fuck not?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:22, 28 February 2008
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:: Alternatively, this would fittingly be a subheading of the Up Late page suggested above. Since the character doesn't really exist outside of that, I think that's reasonable.		:: Alternatively, this would fittingly be a subheading of the Up Late page suggested above. Since the character doesn't really exist outside of that, I think that's reasonable.
		+
		+	MERGE - it would be fine if folded into the JJ (person) article, but this is wasteful. Steven Colbert is a longtime character; this appears to be advertising for a one time event. [[User:Pacman\|Pacman]] 15:22, 28 February 2008 (EST)