Talk:Manhattanville controversy - Revision history

Reaganaut: Talk:Manhattanville Controversy moved to Talk:Manhattanville controversy

2007-04-04T11:54:39Z

Talk:Manhattanville Controversy moved to Talk:Manhattanville controversy

Absentminded: Talk:Manhattanville expansion moved to Talk:Manhattanville Controversy

2007-03-26T04:46:56Z

Talk:Manhattanville expansion moved to Talk:Manhattanville Controversy

Absentminded at 05:07, 20 March 2007

2007-03-20T05:07:39Z

Feinstein at 05:03, 20 March 2007

2007-03-20T05:03:21Z

Absentminded at 04:19, 20 March 2007

2007-03-20T04:19:38Z

Absentminded at 04:19, 20 March 2007

2007-03-20T04:19:04Z

Feinstein at 04:07, 20 March 2007

2007-03-20T04:07:01Z

Absentminded at 03:57, 20 March 2007

2007-03-20T03:57:30Z

Absentminded at 03:57, 20 March 2007

2007-03-20T03:57:20Z

Feinstein at 03:46, 20 March 2007

2007-03-20T03:46:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:07, 20 March 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::: If I may suggest, let's add a See Main Article link for '''Manhattanville Controversy''' to the [[Manhattanville campus]] article, and we can can elaborate on the issues on the Controversy page, and have '''Manhattanville expansion''' redirect to the [[Manhattanville campus]] article, which will focus on the design, the plan, and the neighborhood, since I presume that's the first thing to come to mind when considering the term? [[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 00:19, 20 March 2007 (EDT)		:::: If I may suggest, let's add a See Main Article link for '''Manhattanville Controversy''' to the [[Manhattanville campus]] article, and we can can elaborate on the issues on the Controversy page, and have '''Manhattanville expansion''' redirect to the [[Manhattanville campus]] article, which will focus on the design, the plan, and the neighborhood, since I presume that's the first thing to come to mind when considering the term? [[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 00:19, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
	::::: Sounds like a plan [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 01:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT)		::::: Sounds like a plan [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 01:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
		+	::::::High Five! [[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 01:07, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 20 March 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::: I don't necessarily disagree with you, but in common currency, the word is used to characterize a wide variety of situations. If you asked me, I call most of the incidents surrounding this 'contretemps.' [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 00:07, 20 March 2007 (EDT)		::: I don't necessarily disagree with you, but in common currency, the word is used to characterize a wide variety of situations. If you asked me, I call most of the incidents surrounding this 'contretemps.' [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 00:07, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
	:::: If I may suggest, let's add a See Main Article link for '''Manhattanville Controversy''' to the [[Manhattanville campus]] article, and we can can elaborate on the issues on the Controversy page, and have '''Manhattanville expansion''' redirect to the [[Manhattanville campus]] article, which will focus on the design, the plan, and the neighborhood, since I presume that's the first thing to come to mind when considering the term? [[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 00:19, 20 March 2007 (EDT)		:::: If I may suggest, let's add a See Main Article link for '''Manhattanville Controversy''' to the [[Manhattanville campus]] article, and we can can elaborate on the issues on the Controversy page, and have '''Manhattanville expansion''' redirect to the [[Manhattanville campus]] article, which will focus on the design, the plan, and the neighborhood, since I presume that's the first thing to come to mind when considering the term? [[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 00:19, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
		+	::::: Sounds like a plan [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 01:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ::The expansion plan itself isnt a scandal, however, it is controversial, and there's a difference. A 'scandal' (using the term broadly) would be the various embarrassing episodes chronicled by the Spectator along the way. [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 23:57, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 ::: I don't necessarily disagree with you, but in common currency, the word is used to characterize a wide variety of situations. If you asked me, I call most of the incidents surrounding this  'contretemps.' [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 00:07, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
-:::: If I may suggest, let's add a See Main Article link for '''Manhattanville Controversy''' to the [[Manhattanville campus]] article, and we can can elaborate on the issues on the Controversy page, and have '''Manhattanville expansion''' redirect to the [[Manhattanville campus]] article, since I presume that's the first thing to come to mind when considering the term? [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 00:19, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
+:::: If I may suggest, let's add a See Main Article link for '''Manhattanville Controversy''' to the [[Manhattanville campus]] article, and we can can elaborate on the issues on the Controversy page, and have '''Manhattanville expansion''' redirect to the [[Manhattanville campus]] article, which will focus on the design, the plan, and the neighborhood, since I presume that's the first thing to come to mind when considering the term? [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 00:19, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:19, 20 March 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::The expansion plan itself isnt a scandal, however, it is controversial, and there's a difference. A 'scandal' (using the term broadly) would be the various embarrassing episodes chronicled by the Spectator along the way. [[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 23:57, 19 March 2007 (EDT)		::The expansion plan itself isnt a scandal, however, it is controversial, and there's a difference. A 'scandal' (using the term broadly) would be the various embarrassing episodes chronicled by the Spectator along the way. [[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 23:57, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
	::: I don't necessarily disagree with you, but in common currency, the word is used to characterize a wide variety of situations. If you asked me, I call most of the incidents surrounding this 'contretemps.' [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 00:07, 20 March 2007 (EDT)		::: I don't necessarily disagree with you, but in common currency, the word is used to characterize a wide variety of situations. If you asked me, I call most of the incidents surrounding this 'contretemps.' [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 00:07, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
		+	:::: If I may suggest, let's add a See Main Article link for '''Manhattanville Controversy''' to the [[Manhattanville campus]] article, and we can can elaborate on the issues on the Controversy page, and have '''Manhattanville expansion''' redirect to the [[Manhattanville campus]] article, since I presume that's the first thing to come to mind when considering the term? [[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 00:19, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:07, 20 March 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: That really depends on who you ask. I'm pretty sure an opponent of it would brand it a scandal. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 23:46, 19 March 2007 (EDT)		: That really depends on who you ask. I'm pretty sure an opponent of it would brand it a scandal. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 23:46, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
	::The expansion plan itself isnt a scandal, however, it is controversial, and there's a difference. A 'scandal' (using the term broadly) would be the various embarrassing episodes chronicled by the Spectator along the way. [[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 23:57, 19 March 2007 (EDT)		::The expansion plan itself isnt a scandal, however, it is controversial, and there's a difference. A 'scandal' (using the term broadly) would be the various embarrassing episodes chronicled by the Spectator along the way. [[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 23:57, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
		+	::: I don't necessarily disagree with you, but in common currency, the word is used to characterize a wide variety of situations. If you asked me, I call most of the incidents surrounding this 'contretemps.' [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 00:07, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:54, 4 April 2007
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:46, 26 March 2007
(No difference)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 How is the Expansion a Scandal??[[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 22:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 : That really depends on who you ask. I'm pretty sure an opponent of it would brand it a scandal. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 23:46, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
-::The expansion plan itself isnt a scandal, however, it is controversial, and there's a difference. A 'scandal' (using the term broadly) would be the various embarrassing episodes chronicled by the Spectator along the way.
+::The expansion plan itself isnt a scandal, however, it is controversial, and there's a difference. A 'scandal' (using the term broadly) would be the various embarrassing episodes chronicled by the Spectator along the way. [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 23:57, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:57, 20 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	How is the Expansion a Scandal??[[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 22:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT)		How is the Expansion a Scandal??[[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 22:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
	: That really depends on who you ask. I'm pretty sure an opponent of it would brand it a scandal. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 23:46, 19 March 2007 (EDT)		: That really depends on who you ask. I'm pretty sure an opponent of it would brand it a scandal. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 23:46, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
		+	::The expansion plan itself isnt a scandal, however, it is controversial, and there's a difference. A 'scandal' (using the term broadly) would be the various embarrassing episodes chronicled by the Spectator along the way.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:46, 20 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	How is the Expansion a Scandal??[[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 22:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT)		How is the Expansion a Scandal??[[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 22:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
−	: That really depends on who you ask. I'm pretty sure an opponent of it would brand it a scandal. [[User:~~207.237.223.150~~\|~~207.237.223.150~~]] 23:40, 19 March 2007 (EDT)	+	: That really depends on who you ask. I'm pretty sure an opponent of it would brand it a scandal. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 23:46, 19 March 2007 (EDT)