Talk:Peter Woit - Revision history

Reaganaut at 04:50, 22 November 2012

2012-11-22T04:50:26Z

Pacman at 16:11, 11 April 2007

2007-04-11T16:11:17Z

Umlund at 10:37, 11 April 2007

2007-04-11T10:37:24Z

Umlund at 10:12, 11 April 2007

2007-04-11T10:12:10Z

Umlund: New page: whoa, there, pacman. twice you've said brian greene and peter woit are enemies. as far as i can tell them seem to respect each other, or at least from woit's postings on his blog he seems ...

2007-04-11T10:09:40Z

New page: whoa, there, pacman. twice you've said brian greene and peter woit are enemies. as far as i can tell them seem to respect each other, or at least from woit's postings on his blog he seems ...

New page

whoa, there, pacman. twice you've said brian greene and peter woit are enemies. as far as i can tell them seem to respect
each other, or at least from woit's postings on his blog he seems to respect greene. you might want to consider
not using such a strong (and speculative) word, as fun as it might be. [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 06:09, 11 April 2007 (EDT)

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
-unless this entry has something more to say than the existing wikipedia entry, i suggest simply replacing it with a {{wp-only}}. [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 06:12, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
+unless this entry has something more to say than the existing wikipedia entry, i suggest simply replacing it with a wp-only. [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 06:12, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
 ::Beh, it was just more fun to call them enemies. I guess the era of accuracy has dawned to crush the spirit of WikiCU.
 It still makes sense, though, to have some brief description of Woit and his relationship to Greene (i.e. leave in those things which are linkable to WikiCU). [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 12:11, 11 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 11 April 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	unless this entry has something more to say than the existing wikipedia entry, i suggest simply replacing it with a {{wp-only}}. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 06:12, 11 April 2007 (EDT)		unless this entry has something more to say than the existing wikipedia entry, i suggest simply replacing it with a {{wp-only}}. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 06:12, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	::Beh, it was just more fun to call them enemies. I guess the era of accuracy has dawned to crush the spirit of WikiCU.
		+
		+	It still makes sense, though, to have some brief description of Woit and his relationship to Greene (i.e. leave in those things which are linkable to WikiCU). [[User:Pacman\|Pacman]] 12:11, 11 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:12, 11 April 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	each other, or at least from woit's postings on his blog he seems to respect greene. you might want to consider		each other, or at least from woit's postings on his blog he seems to respect greene. you might want to consider
	not using such a strong (and speculative) word, as fun as it might be. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 06:09, 11 April 2007 (EDT)		not using such a strong (and speculative) word, as fun as it might be. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 06:09, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+
		+	unless this entry has something more to say than the existing wikipedia entry, i suggest simply replacing it with a {{wp-only}}. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 06:12, 11 April 2007 (EDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 whoa, there, pacman. twice you've said brian greene and peter woit are enemies. as far as i can tell them seem to respect
-each other, or at least from woit's postings on his blog he seems to respect greene. you might want to consider
+each other, or at least from woit seems to respect greene:
 not using such a strong (and speculative) word, as fun as it might be. [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 06:09, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
 unless this entry has something more to say than the existing wikipedia entry, i suggest simply replacing it with a {{wp-only}}. [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 06:12, 11 April 2007 (EDT)