Talk:St. Anthony Hall - Revision history

Admin at 10:19, 13 January 2014

2014-01-13T10:19:52Z

Kimmeth234: /* Appropriateness of listing members */

2007-06-20T18:03:25Z

‎Appropriateness of listing members

Reaganaut: /* Appropriateness of listing members */

2007-06-20T17:59:59Z

‎Appropriateness of listing members

Nonsensical at 16:26, 20 June 2007

2007-06-20T16:26:45Z

Reaganaut at 02:02, 20 June 2007

2007-06-20T02:02:11Z

Umlund: /* rollback of member deletion */

2007-06-19T18:49:12Z

‎rollback of member deletion

Umlund: New page: == rollback of member deletion == on 14:39, 19 June 2007, user Kimmeth234 deleted the member list. undiscussed deletion of blocks of text without discussion is considered vanalism. This...

2007-06-19T18:47:23Z

New page: == rollback of member deletion == on 14:39, 19 June 2007, user Kimmeth234 deleted the member list. undiscussed deletion of blocks of text without discussion is considered vanalism. This...

New page

== rollback of member deletion ==

on 14:39, 19 June 2007, user Kimmeth234 deleted the member list. undiscussed deletion of blocks of text without discussion is considered vanalism.
This appears to be Kimmeth234's [http://www.wikicu.com/Special:Contributions/Kimmeth234 only edit]. I'm rolling it back and invite Kimmeth234 and others to start the discussion. [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 14:47, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:19, 13 January 2014
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Fair enough. Thank you		Fair enough. Thank you
	[[User:Kimmeth234\|Kimmeth234]] 14:03, 20 June 2007 (EDT)		[[User:Kimmeth234\|Kimmeth234]] 14:03, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Suicide 1998-2000? ==
		+	Apparently there was a St. A's-related suicide in approx. 1998-2000. If anyone knows about this, please add it to the article, or create a new article. Also, add to suicide category. Thanks! [[User:Admin\|Admin]] 05:19, 13 January 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:03, 20 June 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	* '''Delete''': If [[WikiCU]] is supposed to be the representation of collective campus knowledge, I don't think it's reasonable to hide information just because someone in the group requests it. It's not like it's [[Conversio Virium]], where anonymity is actually a protective measure for those that might not be in the group otherwise; it's a freaking fraternity that just wants anonymity for the sake of secrecy and expects WikiCU to bend to serve that purpose. The only reason anyone cares to see the members listed is because it's so ridiculous for them to claim that it's a secret when they regularly hold parties that make it very clear who the members are. ''On the other hand'', I don't think we should publish rumor, so I'm for deletion, but if there's a reliable source that publishes the names, I'm for putting them back in the article. --[[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 12:26, 20 June 2007 (EDT)		* '''Delete''': If [[WikiCU]] is supposed to be the representation of collective campus knowledge, I don't think it's reasonable to hide information just because someone in the group requests it. It's not like it's [[Conversio Virium]], where anonymity is actually a protective measure for those that might not be in the group otherwise; it's a freaking fraternity that just wants anonymity for the sake of secrecy and expects WikiCU to bend to serve that purpose. The only reason anyone cares to see the members listed is because it's so ridiculous for them to claim that it's a secret when they regularly hold parties that make it very clear who the members are. ''On the other hand'', I don't think we should publish rumor, so I'm for deletion, but if there's a reliable source that publishes the names, I'm for putting them back in the article. --[[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 12:26, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
	:Agreed. I've deleted the members list. If a members list is published elsewhere, we could link to it. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 13:59, 20 June 2007 (EDT)		:Agreed. I've deleted the members list. If a members list is published elsewhere, we could link to it. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 13:59, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	Fair enough. Thank you
		+	[[User:Kimmeth234\|Kimmeth234]] 14:03, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:59, 20 June 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	* '''Delete''': Kimmeth left a comment here: [[User talk:Kimmeth234]]. He/she has now given a good reason for removing the list of members. So I suggest we completely remove the "members" section. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 22:02, 19 June 2007 (EDT)		* '''Delete''': Kimmeth left a comment here: [[User talk:Kimmeth234]]. He/she has now given a good reason for removing the list of members. So I suggest we completely remove the "members" section. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 22:02, 19 June 2007 (EDT)
	* '''Delete''': If [[WikiCU]] is supposed to be the representation of collective campus knowledge, I don't think it's reasonable to hide information just because someone in the group requests it. It's not like it's [[Conversio Virium]], where anonymity is actually a protective measure for those that might not be in the group otherwise; it's a freaking fraternity that just wants anonymity for the sake of secrecy and expects WikiCU to bend to serve that purpose. The only reason anyone cares to see the members listed is because it's so ridiculous for them to claim that it's a secret when they regularly hold parties that make it very clear who the members are. ''On the other hand'', I don't think we should publish rumor, so I'm for deletion, but if there's a reliable source that publishes the names, I'm for putting them back in the article. --[[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 12:26, 20 June 2007 (EDT)		* '''Delete''': If [[WikiCU]] is supposed to be the representation of collective campus knowledge, I don't think it's reasonable to hide information just because someone in the group requests it. It's not like it's [[Conversio Virium]], where anonymity is actually a protective measure for those that might not be in the group otherwise; it's a freaking fraternity that just wants anonymity for the sake of secrecy and expects WikiCU to bend to serve that purpose. The only reason anyone cares to see the members listed is because it's so ridiculous for them to claim that it's a secret when they regularly hold parties that make it very clear who the members are. ''On the other hand'', I don't think we should publish rumor, so I'm for deletion, but if there's a reliable source that publishes the names, I'm for putting them back in the article. --[[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 12:26, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
		+	:Agreed. I've deleted the members list. If a members list is published elsewhere, we could link to it. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 13:59, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Kimmeth234 then undid this change. Kimmeth234 was blocked for 2 hours to think about it. [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 14:49, 19 June 2007 (EDT)
+== Appropriateness of listing members ==
-Kimmeth left a comment here: [[User talk:Kimmeth234]]. He/she has now given a good reason for removing the list of members. So I suggest we completely remove the "members" section. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 22:02, 19 June 2007 (EDT)
+* '''Delete''': Kimmeth left a comment here: [[User talk:Kimmeth234]]. He/she has now given a good reason for removing the list of members. So I suggest we completely remove the "members" section. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 22:02, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:02, 20 June 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Kimmeth234 then undid this change. Kimmeth234 was blocked for 2 hours to think about it. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 14:49, 19 June 2007 (EDT)		Kimmeth234 then undid this change. Kimmeth234 was blocked for 2 hours to think about it. [[User:Umlund\|Umlund]] 14:49, 19 June 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+
		+	Kimmeth left a comment here: [[User talk:Kimmeth234]]. He/she has now given a good reason for removing the list of members. So I suggest we completely remove the "members" section. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 22:02, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == rollback of member deletion ==
 on 14:39, 19 June 2007, user Kimmeth234 deleted the member list. undiscussed deletion of blocks of text without discussion is considered vanalism.
 This appears to be Kimmeth234's [http://www.wikicu.com/Special:Contributions/Kimmeth234 only edit]. I'm rolling it back and invite Kimmeth234 and others to start the discussion. [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 14:47, 19 June 2007 (EDT)