Talk:Tao Tan - Revision history

Ttan: Blanked the page

2023-12-15T18:26:25Z

Blanked the page

Adolph Lewisohn at 00:25, 28 May 2007

2007-05-28T00:25:03Z

Reaganaut: cleaning up bullet points

2007-05-28T00:04:03Z

cleaning up bullet points

Ttan at 23:21, 27 May 2007

2007-05-27T23:21:15Z

Adolph Lewisohn at 21:42, 27 May 2007

2007-05-27T21:42:19Z

Stephen.wang at 06:48, 20 May 2007

2007-05-20T06:48:06Z

Ttan at 16:37, 19 May 2007

2007-05-19T16:37:24Z

160.39.192.81 at 16:36, 19 May 2007

2007-05-19T16:36:39Z

Reaganaut at 16:25, 19 May 2007

2007-05-19T16:25:52Z

72.74.81.234 at 07:20, 19 May 2007

2007-05-19T07:20:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:26, 15 December 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~== Nomination for Deletion ==~~	+
−	*'''Delete''' - I graduated. My talk page will be sufficient. [[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 10:28, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
−	*'''Delete''' - Although I feel bad about deleting someone who's being surprisingly humble. [[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 10:32, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
−	*'''Keep''' - come on, Tao, lots of people knew who you were - you're at least as notable as [[Riddhi Dasgupta\|Riddhi]]. Unless it contains malicious information, which you can delete, it's not going to ruin your career path. [[User:Pacman\|Pacman]] 12:54, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
−	*'''Terminate''' - Whatever Tao wants, Tao gets. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 21:09, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
−	*'''Leave Blank''' - I wish Tao wanted to stay, but if he wants not to have a page, maybe he shouldn't. that said, how do you permanently prevent someone from putting up inane spam? Possibly you should make a Tao Tan page that says "page left blank at request of Tao Tan". Or at least "this space intentionally left blank" (with discussion page left intact to discuss). [[User:Foobar\|Foobar]] 22:27, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
−	~~:*I'm going to continue contributing. I just don't think this page is necessary since I'm gone. [[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 22:47, 18 May 2007 (EDT)~~
−	~~::*That's inconsistent with every other recent alumnus. [[User:72.74.81.234\|72.74.81.234]] 03:20, 19 May 2007 (EDT)~~
−	*'''Delete''' - I agree with Pacman... Tao is notable. We should keep the article about him, especially since it doesn't contain any malicious or otherwise harmful information. If anything, an administrator could protect the article so that there's no risk someone will add malicious information in the future. Furthermore, I question why WikiCU should remove its basic non-harmful article about Tao when, for example, Bwog probably isn't going to pull down it's much more extensive, much more potentially damaging articles about him. So why am I voting to delete? I think it's in the interests of WikiCU to respect people in the Columbia community and especially respect the wishes of people who have contributed a great deal to the site. If Tao wants the article deleted, we should delete it. Tao, please reconsider! {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 12:25, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
−	~~:*If you can protect this page and basically leave it completely frozen, then I am OK with that. [[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 12:37, 19 May 2007 (EDT)~~
−	*'''Keep''' ...frozen like eggs at the fertility clinic. [[User:Stephen.wang\|wang]] 02:48, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
−	*'''Keep''' - Tao Tan's website once gave me two credits for a one credit field trip in Ken Jackson's class. [[User:Adolph Lewisohn\|Adolph Lewisohn]] 17:42, 27 May 2007 (EDT)
−	~~:*Did you end up with extra credit? [[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 19:21, 27 May 2007 (EDT)~~
−	:**I'm not sure. I never got my final back, but KJ once spent 10 minutes ranting about never giving out A+s, so I'm guessing that I did not. [[User:Adolph Lewisohn\|Adolph Lewisohn]] 20:25, 27 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:25, 28 May 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	*'''Keep''' - Tao Tan's website once gave me two credits for a one credit field trip in Ken Jackson's class. [[User:Adolph Lewisohn\|Adolph Lewisohn]] 17:42, 27 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Keep''' - Tao Tan's website once gave me two credits for a one credit field trip in Ken Jackson's class. [[User:Adolph Lewisohn\|Adolph Lewisohn]] 17:42, 27 May 2007 (EDT)
	:*Did you end up with extra credit? [[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 19:21, 27 May 2007 (EDT)		:*Did you end up with extra credit? [[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 19:21, 27 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	:**I'm not sure. I never got my final back, but KJ once spent 10 minutes ranting about never giving out A+s, so I'm guessing that I did not. [[User:Adolph Lewisohn\|Adolph Lewisohn]] 20:25, 27 May 2007 (EDT)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 *'''Terminate''' - Whatever Tao wants, Tao gets. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 21:09, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
 *'''Leave Blank''' - I wish Tao wanted to stay, but if he wants not to have a page, maybe he shouldn't. that said, how do you permanently prevent someone from putting up inane spam? Possibly you should make a Tao Tan page that says "page left blank at request of Tao Tan". Or at least "this space intentionally left blank" (with discussion page left intact to discuss). [[User:Foobar|Foobar]] 22:27, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
-:I'm going to continue contributing. I just don't think this page is necessary since I'm gone. [[User:Ttan|Ttan]] 22:47, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
+:*I'm going to continue contributing. I just don't think this page is necessary since I'm gone. [[User:Ttan|Ttan]] 22:47, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
-::That's inconsistent with every other recent alumnus. [[User:72.74.81.234|72.74.81.234]] 03:20, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
+::*That's inconsistent with every other recent alumnus. [[User:72.74.81.234|72.74.81.234]] 03:20, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
 *'''Delete''' - I agree with Pacman... Tao is notable. We should keep the article about him, especially since it doesn't contain any malicious or otherwise harmful information. If anything, an administrator could protect the article so that there's no risk someone will add malicious information in the future. Furthermore, I question why WikiCU should remove its basic non-harmful article about Tao when, for example, Bwog probably isn't going to pull down it's much more extensive, much more potentially damaging articles about him. So why am I voting to delete? I think it's in the interests of WikiCU to respect people in the Columbia community and especially respect the wishes of people who have contributed a great deal to the site. If Tao wants the article deleted, we should delete it. Tao, please reconsider! {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 12:25, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
-:If you can protect this page and basically leave it completely frozen, then I am OK with that. [[User:Ttan|Ttan]] 12:37, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
+:*If you can protect this page and basically leave it completely frozen, then I am OK with that. [[User:Ttan|Ttan]] 12:37, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
-*:'''Keep''' ...frozen like eggs at the fertility clinic. [[User:Stephen.wang|wang]] 02:48, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
+*'''Keep''' ...frozen like eggs at the fertility clinic. [[User:Stephen.wang|wang]] 02:48, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
 *'''Keep''' - Tao Tan's website once gave me two credits for a one credit field trip in Ken Jackson's class. [[User:Adolph Lewisohn|Adolph Lewisohn]] 17:42, 27 May 2007 (EDT)
-*:Did you end up with extra credit? [[User:Ttan|Ttan]] 19:21, 27 May 2007 (EDT)
+:*Did you end up with extra credit? [[User:Ttan|Ttan]] 19:21, 27 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:21, 27 May 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	*:'''Keep''' ...frozen like eggs at the fertility clinic. [[User:Stephen.wang\|wang]] 02:48, 20 May 2007 (EDT)		*:'''Keep''' ...frozen like eggs at the fertility clinic. [[User:Stephen.wang\|wang]] 02:48, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
	*'''Keep''' - Tao Tan's website once gave me two credits for a one credit field trip in Ken Jackson's class. [[User:Adolph Lewisohn\|Adolph Lewisohn]] 17:42, 27 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Keep''' - Tao Tan's website once gave me two credits for a one credit field trip in Ken Jackson's class. [[User:Adolph Lewisohn\|Adolph Lewisohn]] 17:42, 27 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	*:Did you end up with extra credit? [[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 19:21, 27 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 27 May 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:If you can protect this page and basically leave it completely frozen, then I am OK with that. [[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 12:37, 19 May 2007 (EDT)		:If you can protect this page and basically leave it completely frozen, then I am OK with that. [[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 12:37, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
	*:'''Keep''' ...frozen like eggs at the fertility clinic. [[User:Stephen.wang\|wang]] 02:48, 20 May 2007 (EDT)		*:'''Keep''' ...frozen like eggs at the fertility clinic. [[User:Stephen.wang\|wang]] 02:48, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	*'''Keep''' - Tao Tan's website once gave me two credits for a one credit field trip in Ken Jackson's class. [[User:Adolph Lewisohn\|Adolph Lewisohn]] 17:42, 27 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:48, 20 May 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*'''Delete''' - I agree with Pacman... Tao is notable. We should keep the article about him, especially since it doesn't contain any malicious or otherwise harmful information. If anything, an administrator could protect the article so that there's no risk someone will add malicious information in the future. Furthermore, I question why WikiCU should remove its basic non-harmful article about Tao when, for example, Bwog probably isn't going to pull down it's much more extensive, much more potentially damaging articles about him. So why am I voting to delete? I think it's in the interests of WikiCU to respect people in the Columbia community and especially respect the wishes of people who have contributed a great deal to the site. If Tao wants the article deleted, we should delete it. Tao, please reconsider! {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 12:25, 19 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Delete''' - I agree with Pacman... Tao is notable. We should keep the article about him, especially since it doesn't contain any malicious or otherwise harmful information. If anything, an administrator could protect the article so that there's no risk someone will add malicious information in the future. Furthermore, I question why WikiCU should remove its basic non-harmful article about Tao when, for example, Bwog probably isn't going to pull down it's much more extensive, much more potentially damaging articles about him. So why am I voting to delete? I think it's in the interests of WikiCU to respect people in the Columbia community and especially respect the wishes of people who have contributed a great deal to the site. If Tao wants the article deleted, we should delete it. Tao, please reconsider! {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 12:25, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
	:If you can protect this page and basically leave it completely frozen, then I am OK with that. [[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 12:37, 19 May 2007 (EDT)		:If you can protect this page and basically leave it completely frozen, then I am OK with that. [[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 12:37, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	*:'''Keep''' ...frozen like eggs at the fertility clinic. [[User:Stephen.wang\|wang]] 02:48, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:36, 19 May 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::That's inconsistent with every other recent alumnus. [[User:72.74.81.234\|72.74.81.234]] 03:20, 19 May 2007 (EDT)		::That's inconsistent with every other recent alumnus. [[User:72.74.81.234\|72.74.81.234]] 03:20, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
	*'''Delete''' - I agree with Pacman... Tao is notable. We should keep the article about him, especially since it doesn't contain any malicious or otherwise harmful information. If anything, an administrator could protect the article so that there's no risk someone will add malicious information in the future. Furthermore, I question why WikiCU should remove its basic non-harmful article about Tao when, for example, Bwog probably isn't going to pull down it's much more extensive, much more potentially damaging articles about him. So why am I voting to delete? I think it's in the interests of WikiCU to respect people in the Columbia community and especially respect the wishes of people who have contributed a great deal to the site. If Tao wants the article deleted, we should delete it. Tao, please reconsider! {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 12:25, 19 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Delete''' - I agree with Pacman... Tao is notable. We should keep the article about him, especially since it doesn't contain any malicious or otherwise harmful information. If anything, an administrator could protect the article so that there's no risk someone will add malicious information in the future. Furthermore, I question why WikiCU should remove its basic non-harmful article about Tao when, for example, Bwog probably isn't going to pull down it's much more extensive, much more potentially damaging articles about him. So why am I voting to delete? I think it's in the interests of WikiCU to respect people in the Columbia community and especially respect the wishes of people who have contributed a great deal to the site. If Tao wants the article deleted, we should delete it. Tao, please reconsider! {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 12:25, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	:If you can protect this page and basically leave it completely frozen, then I am OK with that. [[User:160.39.192.81\|160.39.192.81]] 12:36, 19 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 19 May 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I'm going to continue contributing. I just don't think this page is necessary since I'm gone. [[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 22:47, 18 May 2007 (EDT)		:I'm going to continue contributing. I just don't think this page is necessary since I'm gone. [[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 22:47, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
	::That's inconsistent with every other recent alumnus. [[User:72.74.81.234\|72.74.81.234]] 03:20, 19 May 2007 (EDT)		::That's inconsistent with every other recent alumnus. [[User:72.74.81.234\|72.74.81.234]] 03:20, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	*'''Delete''' - I agree with Pacman... Tao is notable. We should keep the article about him, especially since it doesn't contain any malicious or otherwise harmful information. If anything, an administrator could protect the article so that there's no risk someone will add malicious information in the future. Furthermore, I question why WikiCU should remove its basic non-harmful article about Tao when, for example, Bwog probably isn't going to pull down it's much more extensive, much more potentially damaging articles about him. So why am I voting to delete? I think it's in the interests of WikiCU to respect people in the Columbia community and especially respect the wishes of people who have contributed a great deal to the site. If Tao wants the article deleted, we should delete it. Tao, please reconsider! {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 12:25, 19 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:20, 19 May 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*'''Leave Blank''' - I wish Tao wanted to stay, but if he wants not to have a page, maybe he shouldn't. that said, how do you permanently prevent someone from putting up inane spam? Possibly you should make a Tao Tan page that says "page left blank at request of Tao Tan". Or at least "this space intentionally left blank" (with discussion page left intact to discuss). [[User:Foobar\|Foobar]] 22:27, 18 May 2007 (EDT)		*'''Leave Blank''' - I wish Tao wanted to stay, but if he wants not to have a page, maybe he shouldn't. that said, how do you permanently prevent someone from putting up inane spam? Possibly you should make a Tao Tan page that says "page left blank at request of Tao Tan". Or at least "this space intentionally left blank" (with discussion page left intact to discuss). [[User:Foobar\|Foobar]] 22:27, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
	:I'm going to continue contributing. I just don't think this page is necessary since I'm gone. [[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 22:47, 18 May 2007 (EDT)		:I'm going to continue contributing. I just don't think this page is necessary since I'm gone. [[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 22:47, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	::That's inconsistent with every other recent alumnus. [[User:72.74.81.234\|72.74.81.234]] 03:20, 19 May 2007 (EDT)