Talk:University Shield - Revision history

https://www.wikicu.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AUniversity_Shield Talk:University Shield - Revision history 2026-04-12T02:16:34Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.31.8 https://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Talk:University_Shield&diff=30516&oldid=prev Absentminded at 16:43, 12 October 2009 2009-10-12T16:43:03Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 16:43, 12 October 2009</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l2" >Line 2:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 2:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>:Apparently. It's in the official style guide and everything. For the life of me I don't understand why they'd skip the original design, *and* the design they trademarked with the PTO for some Frankenstein design. Not to mention it's colored wrong despite being featured in a publication whose *title* is the definition of Columbia blue. I don't get it sometimes. [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 03:06, 5 October 2009 (EDT)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>:Apparently. It's in the official style guide and everything. For the life of me I don't understand why they'd skip the original design, *and* the design they trademarked with the PTO for some Frankenstein design. Not to mention it's colored wrong despite being featured in a publication whose *title* is the definition of Columbia blue. I don't get it sometimes. [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 03:06, 5 October 2009 (EDT)</div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::How long until you muscle your way into the Columbia GC office and fix this shit? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 19:51, 11 October 2009 (EDT)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::How long until you muscle your way into the Columbia GC office and fix this shit? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 19:51, 11 October 2009 (EDT)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">:::I doubt they care what I think. The key is to find someone who does care and approach through them. That's why I'm minding my time, slowly building up the paper trail. I think I've traced the historical use of the Crown as a school symbol to a student organization founded in 1898 and the hand drawn Crown logo they adopted. [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 12:43, 12 October 2009 (EDT)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Absentminded https://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Talk:University_Shield&diff=30512&oldid=prev Pacman at 23:51, 11 October 2009 2009-10-11T23:51:18Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 23:51, 11 October 2009</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Wait, the bastard shield is real!? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 23:44, 4 October 2009 (EDT)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Wait, the bastard shield is real!? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 23:44, 4 October 2009 (EDT)</div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>:Apparently. It's in the official style guide and everything. For the life of me I don't understand why they'd skip the original design, *and* the design they trademarked with the PTO for some Frankenstein design. Not to mention it's colored wrong despite being featured in a publication whose *title* is the definition of Columbia blue. I don't get it sometimes. [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 03:06, 5 October 2009 (EDT)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>:Apparently. It's in the official style guide and everything. For the life of me I don't understand why they'd skip the original design, *and* the design they trademarked with the PTO for some Frankenstein design. Not to mention it's colored wrong despite being featured in a publication whose *title* is the definition of Columbia blue. I don't get it sometimes. [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 03:06, 5 October 2009 (EDT)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">::How long until you muscle your way into the Columbia GC office and fix this shit? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 19:51, 11 October 2009 (EDT)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Pacman https://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Talk:University_Shield&diff=30424&oldid=prev Absentminded at 07:06, 5 October 2009 2009-10-05T07:06:13Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 07:06, 5 October 2009</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Wait, the bastard shield is real!? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 23:44, 4 October 2009 (EDT)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Wait, the bastard shield is real!? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 23:44, 4 October 2009 (EDT)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">:Apparently. It's in the official style guide and everything. For the life of me I don't understand why they'd skip the original design, *and* the design they trademarked with the PTO for some Frankenstein design. Not to mention it's colored wrong despite being featured in a publication whose *title* is the definition of Columbia blue. I don't get it sometimes. [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 03:06, 5 October 2009 (EDT)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Absentminded https://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Talk:University_Shield&diff=30418&oldid=prev Pacman: New page: Wait, the bastard shield is real!? ~~~~ 2009-10-05T03:44:25Z

<p>New page: Wait, the bastard shield is real!? ~~~~</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>Wait, the bastard shield is real!? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 23:44, 4 October 2009 (EDT)</div>

Pacman