Tenure - Revision history

Reaganaut at 17:43, 23 April 2008

2008-04-23T17:43:39Z

Pacman at 22:05, 10 December 2007

2007-12-10T22:05:07Z

Pacman at 22:04, 10 December 2007

2007-12-10T22:04:45Z

Pacman at 21:51, 10 December 2007

2007-12-10T21:51:18Z

Pacman at 21:50, 10 December 2007

2007-12-10T21:50:40Z

Absentminded: /* External links */

2007-12-10T06:25:58Z

‎External links

Absentminded at 06:25, 10 December 2007

2007-12-10T06:25:42Z

Absentminded: New page: '''Tenure''' is the holy grail of academia. Getting it is kind of a big deal. Like everything else at Columbia, it's often a source of controversy. All higher education instructors can be...

2007-12-10T06:10:46Z

New page: '''Tenure''' is the holy grail of academia. Getting it is kind of a big deal. Like everything else at Columbia, it's often a source of controversy. All higher education instructors can be...

New page

'''Tenure''' is the holy grail of academia. Getting it is kind of a big deal. Like everything else at Columbia, it's often a source of controversy.

All higher education instructors can be divided into two groups. Those who have tenure, and those who do not. The latter group can be divided in to two more groups, those who are on the tenure track, and those who are not. This last group makes up a large portion of [[PhD]] holders.

It is the source of much politicking, as since [[1973]], Columbia controls the tenuring process for [[Barnard College]]. Since [[1983]] Barnard has gotten some say in the process, but the final decision still gets made by the big bad university.

See also:
*[[Joseph Massad]]
*[[Nadia Abu El-Haj]]
*[[James Russell]]
*[[Mark Slouka]]

[[Category:Academics]]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 *[http://www.columbia.edu/cu/vpaa/docs/tenframe.html Principles and Customs Governing the Procedures of Ad Hoc Committees and University-Wide Tenure Review]
-[[Category:Academics]]
+[[Category:Faculty]]
 [[Category:Tenure controversies|*]]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 The only school exempt from the central ad hoc review process is the [[Law School]], which has had autonomy over its faculty appointments since the 1970s deanship of [[Michael I. Sovern]]. [[Teachers College]] also does its own thing.
-[[Category:Tenure controversies|Tenure controversies]] have surrounded a number of professors, including [[Joseph Massad]], [[Nadia Abu El-Haj]], [[James Russell]], and [[Mark Slouka]].
+[[:Category:Tenure controversies|Tenure controversies]] have surrounded a number of professors, including [[Joseph Massad]], [[Nadia Abu El-Haj]], [[James Russell]], and [[Mark Slouka]].
 == External links ==

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 The only school exempt from the central ad hoc review process is the [[Law School]], which has had autonomy over its faculty appointments since the 1970s deanship of [[Michael I. Sovern]]. [[Teachers College]] also does its own thing.
-See also:
+[[Category:Tenure controversies|Tenure controversies]] have surrounded a number of professors, including [[Joseph Massad]], [[Nadia Abu El-Haj]], [[James Russell]], and [[Mark Slouka]].
 == External links ==

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 It is the source of much politicking, as since [[1973]], Columbia controls the tenuring process for [[Barnard College]]. Since [[1983]] Barnard has gotten some say in the process, but the final decision still gets made by the big bad university.
-The only school exempt from the central ad hoc review process is the [[Law School]], which has had autonomy over it's faculty appointments since the 1970s deanship of [[Michael I. Sovern]]. [[Teachers College]] also does its own thing.
+The only school exempt from the central ad hoc review process is the [[Law School]], which has had autonomy over its faculty appointments since the 1970s deanship of [[Michael I. Sovern]]. [[Teachers College]] also does its own thing.
 See also:
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 [[Category:Academics]]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 == External links ==
 *[http://www.columbiaspectator.com/?q=node/24127 The Road to the Tenure Verdict], Columbia Spectator, February 26, 2007
-*[http://www.columbia.edu/cu/vpaa/docs/tenframe.html
+*[http://www.columbia.edu/cu/vpaa/docs/tenframe.html Principles and Customs Governing the Procedures of Ad Hoc Committees and University-Wide Tenure Review]
 Principles and Customs Governing the Procedures of Ad Hoc Committees and University-Wide Tenure Review]
 [[Category:Academics]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''Tenure''' is the holy grail of academia. Getting it is kind of a big deal. Like everything else at Columbia, it's often a source of controversy.
-All higher education instructors can be divided into two groups. Those who have tenure, and those who do not. The latter group can be divided in to two more groups, those who are on the tenure track, and those who are not. This last group makes up a large portion of [[PhD]] holders.
+All higher education instructors can be divided into two groups: those who have tenure, and those who do not. The latter group can be divided in to two more groups, those who are on the tenure track, and those who are not. This last group makes up a large portion of [[PhD]] holders.
 It is the source of much politicking, as since [[1973]], Columbia controls the tenuring process for [[Barnard College]]. Since [[1983]] Barnard has gotten some say in the process, but the final decision still gets made by the big bad university.