User talk:Nonsensical - Revision history

Absentminded at 19:20, 26 January 2009

2009-01-26T19:20:24Z

Nonsensical at 06:42, 12 July 2007

2007-07-12T06:42:01Z

Foobar at 06:38, 12 July 2007

2007-07-12T06:38:39Z

Reaganaut at 00:04, 19 June 2007

2007-06-19T00:04:33Z

Weknowabtthat at 14:14, 13 June 2007

2007-06-13T14:14:11Z

156.145.52.67: /* Please Remove the Website Information from the Sorority Pages */

2007-06-01T20:55:36Z

‎Please Remove the Website Information from the Sorority Pages

Amanda: Please Remove the Website Information from the Sorority Pages

2007-06-01T14:41:36Z

Please Remove the Website Information from the Sorority Pages

Reaganaut at 00:15, 20 May 2007

2007-05-20T00:15:44Z

Feinstein: New page: I rolled back your removal of Tao Tan's credit on a number of articles. This isn't Wikipedia and there's never been any explicit agreement to assume we follow Wikipedia policies. Several a...

2007-05-02T21:22:28Z

New page: I rolled back your removal of Tao Tan's credit on a number of articles. This isn't Wikipedia and there's never been any explicit agreement to assume we follow Wikipedia policies. Several a...

New page

I rolled back your removal of Tao Tan's credit on a number of articles. This isn't Wikipedia and there's never been any explicit agreement to assume we follow Wikipedia policies. Several administrators felt that Tao deserved credit as the articles represent his original research. Regarding NPOV, pet theories, etc., these are allowed here. We can discuss these policies and specific articles (on talk pages) but do not assume wikipedia rules. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 17:22, 2 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:20, 26 January 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:
	wow! amazing work on the new CS faculty pages! [[User:Foobar\|Foobar]] 02:38, 12 July 2007 (EDT)		wow! amazing work on the new CS faculty pages! [[User:Foobar\|Foobar]] 02:38, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
	:hehe, thanks. I knew that Stephen Edwards McDonalds story just ''had'' to be on here. --[[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 02:42, 12 July 2007 (EDT)		:hehe, thanks. I knew that Stephen Edwards McDonalds story just ''had'' to be on here. --[[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 02:42, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	==Long time no see==
		+	Welcome back? [[User:Absentminded\|Absentminded]] 14:20, 26 January 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:42, 12 July 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	----		----
	wow! amazing work on the new CS faculty pages! [[User:Foobar\|Foobar]] 02:38, 12 July 2007 (EDT)		wow! amazing work on the new CS faculty pages! [[User:Foobar\|Foobar]] 02:38, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
		+	:hehe, thanks. I knew that Stephen Edwards McDonalds story just ''had'' to be on here. --[[User:Nonsensical\|Nonsensical]] 02:42, 12 July 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:38, 12 July 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:

	How can you just delete a created page. And why do admins get to dictate what is funny? The Matt Sanchez page and Erica Jackson page aren't very funny and they seem like attack pages as well. Why aren't those deleted but pages that are about admins are? It's not fair and you guys don't even play by your own rules.		How can you just delete a created page. And why do admins get to dictate what is funny? The Matt Sanchez page and Erica Jackson page aren't very funny and they seem like attack pages as well. Why aren't those deleted but pages that are about admins are? It's not fair and you guys don't even play by your own rules.
		+
		+	----
		+	wow! amazing work on the new CS faculty pages! [[User:Foobar\|Foobar]] 02:38, 12 July 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:04, 19 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	{{prezbo\|For your many excellent contributions!<br/>{{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 20:15, 19 May 2007 (EDT)}}	+	{{prezbo\|For your many excellent contributions!<br/>And especially the [[list of clubs that need articles]]!<br/>{{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 20:15, 19 May 2007 (EDT)}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:14, 13 June 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I rolled back your removal of Tao Tan's credit on a number of articles. This isn't Wikipedia and there's never been any explicit agreement to assume we follow Wikipedia policies. Several administrators felt that Tao deserved credit as the articles represent his original research. Regarding NPOV, pet theories, etc., these are allowed here. We can discuss these policies and specific articles (on talk pages) but do not assume wikipedia rules. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 17:22, 2 May 2007 (EDT)		I rolled back your removal of Tao Tan's credit on a number of articles. This isn't Wikipedia and there's never been any explicit agreement to assume we follow Wikipedia policies. Several administrators felt that Tao deserved credit as the articles represent his original research. Regarding NPOV, pet theories, etc., these are allowed here. We can discuss these policies and specific articles (on talk pages) but do not assume wikipedia rules. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 17:22, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	Why don't you follow your own rules?
		+
		+	From the WikiCU help page:
		+	" Complaints about an article
		+
		+	Wikipedia doesn't censor content. Neither does WikiCU. Occasionally someone will post stuff that others don't like. This might include slander or unnecessarily personal information. You are welcome to remove this content yourself by editing the article."
		+
		+	How can you just delete a created page. And why do admins get to dictate what is funny? The Matt Sanchez page and Erica Jackson page aren't very funny and they seem like attack pages as well. Why aren't those deleted but pages that are about admins are? It's not fair and you guys don't even play by your own rules.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 1 June 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I rolled back your removal of Tao Tan's credit on a number of articles. This isn't Wikipedia and there's never been any explicit agreement to assume we follow Wikipedia policies. Several administrators felt that Tao deserved credit as the articles represent his original research. Regarding NPOV, pet theories, etc., these are allowed here. We can discuss these policies and specific articles (on talk pages) but do not assume wikipedia rules. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 17:22, 2 May 2007 (EDT)		I rolled back your removal of Tao Tan's credit on a number of articles. This isn't Wikipedia and there's never been any explicit agreement to assume we follow Wikipedia policies. Several administrators felt that Tao deserved credit as the articles represent his original research. Regarding NPOV, pet theories, etc., these are allowed here. We can discuss these policies and specific articles (on talk pages) but do not assume wikipedia rules. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 17:22, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
−
−	~~== Please Remove the Website Information from the Sorority Pages ==~~
−
−	Please do not make up sorority information. The stuff you have put up about two sororities is inaccurate and biasedSince I was involved in making one of the websites, I am personally offended by you and Tao Tan's continual altering of these statements. Neither sorority protested against the other about something as trivial as a website page designed by the Macintosh program iWeb. The templates are similar because they are just that: Templates. The iWeb template makes the headings in that format. Neither sorority sought to copy the other, it's just "nonsensical." No one even looks at sorority websites before going through recruitment so having a cat-fight over such nonsense would be futile. Again, I wouldn't even care but I helped make one of the websites and it really hurts my feelings that someone went to such great lengths to make it look like the websites were designed specifically to target each other.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:41, 1 June 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I rolled back your removal of Tao Tan's credit on a number of articles. This isn't Wikipedia and there's never been any explicit agreement to assume we follow Wikipedia policies. Several administrators felt that Tao deserved credit as the articles represent his original research. Regarding NPOV, pet theories, etc., these are allowed here. We can discuss these policies and specific articles (on talk pages) but do not assume wikipedia rules. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 17:22, 2 May 2007 (EDT)		I rolled back your removal of Tao Tan's credit on a number of articles. This isn't Wikipedia and there's never been any explicit agreement to assume we follow Wikipedia policies. Several administrators felt that Tao deserved credit as the articles represent his original research. Regarding NPOV, pet theories, etc., these are allowed here. We can discuss these policies and specific articles (on talk pages) but do not assume wikipedia rules. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 17:22, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Please Remove the Website Information from the Sorority Pages ==
		+
		+	Please do not make up sorority information. The stuff you have put up about two sororities is inaccurate and biasedSince I was involved in making one of the websites, I am personally offended by you and Tao Tan's continual altering of these statements. Neither sorority protested against the other about something as trivial as a website page designed by the Macintosh program iWeb. The templates are similar because they are just that: Templates. The iWeb template makes the headings in that format. Neither sorority sought to copy the other, it's just "nonsensical." No one even looks at sorority websites before going through recruitment so having a cat-fight over such nonsense would be futile. Again, I wouldn't even care but I helped make one of the websites and it really hurts my feelings that someone went to such great lengths to make it look like the websites were designed specifically to target each other.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:15, 20 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{prezbo\|For your many excellent contributions!<br/>{{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 20:15, 19 May 2007 (EDT)}}
		+
		+
		+
	I rolled back your removal of Tao Tan's credit on a number of articles. This isn't Wikipedia and there's never been any explicit agreement to assume we follow Wikipedia policies. Several administrators felt that Tao deserved credit as the articles represent his original research. Regarding NPOV, pet theories, etc., these are allowed here. We can discuss these policies and specific articles (on talk pages) but do not assume wikipedia rules. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 17:22, 2 May 2007 (EDT)		I rolled back your removal of Tao Tan's credit on a number of articles. This isn't Wikipedia and there's never been any explicit agreement to assume we follow Wikipedia policies. Several administrators felt that Tao deserved credit as the articles represent his original research. Regarding NPOV, pet theories, etc., these are allowed here. We can discuss these policies and specific articles (on talk pages) but do not assume wikipedia rules. [[User:Feinstein\|Feinstein]] 17:22, 2 May 2007 (EDT)