Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lit Hum exam leak (2007)"
Nonsensical (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Damn, it's been a good year for scandals. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 19:39, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | Damn, it's been a good year for scandals. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 19:39, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | I don't know about posting completely unsubstantiated claims about who leaked the exam. Seems a bit slanderous. Innocent until proven guilty? Or at least ''some'' evidence exists besides a random Bwog post. Thoughts anyone? [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 15:51, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | + | :I don't know about posting completely unsubstantiated claims about who leaked the exam. Seems a bit slanderous. Innocent until proven guilty? Or at least ''some'' evidence exists besides a random Bwog post. Thoughts anyone? [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 15:51, 8 May 2007 (EDT) |
| + | |||
| + | ::I think you're right. I just get carried away sometimes. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 16:19, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:19, 8 May 2007
Damn, it's been a good year for scandals. Feinstein 19:39, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- I don't know about posting completely unsubstantiated claims about who leaked the exam. Seems a bit slanderous. Innocent until proven guilty? Or at least some evidence exists besides a random Bwog post. Thoughts anyone? Nonsensical 15:51, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
- I think you're right. I just get carried away sometimes. − Reaganaut 16:19, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
