Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lit Hum exam leak (2007)"
m (moved Talk:Lit Hum exam leak to Talk:Lit Hum exam leak (2007): There are now 2 Lit Hum exam leaks (2007 and 2013), so we need to specify this one refers to the one in 2007) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::I think you're right. I just get carried away sometimes. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 16:19, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | ::I think you're right. I just get carried away sometimes. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 16:19, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Well, I guess there's something to be said for unsubstantiated hearsay. [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 11:04, 9 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:41, 11 May 2013
Damn, it's been a good year for scandals. Feinstein 19:39, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- I don't know about posting completely unsubstantiated claims about who leaked the exam. Seems a bit slanderous. Innocent until proven guilty? Or at least some evidence exists besides a random Bwog post. Thoughts anyone? Nonsensical 15:51, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
- I think you're right. I just get carried away sometimes. − Reaganaut 16:19, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
- Well, I guess there's something to be said for unsubstantiated hearsay. Nonsensical 11:04, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
