Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Fraternities"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Apparently many administrators don't like the frats and want to see them gone. Anyone know why? [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 15:07, 26 April 2007 (EDT) | Apparently many administrators don't like the frats and want to see them gone. Anyone know why? [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 15:07, 26 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Town-Gown relations. The administrators see fraternities as little more than drinking clubs. Not to mention that the brownstones they occupy are incredibly expensive and it doesn't cost much more to live in them than it does to live in the dorms, so I believe they operate the buildings at a loss. [[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] 01:02, 30 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Is there any way to make it so that [[Fraternities]] doesn't appear as an item on its own category page? [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 14:01, 29 April 2007 (EDT) | Is there any way to make it so that [[Fraternities]] doesn't appear as an item on its own category page? [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 14:01, 29 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Yeah, I'll change it. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 20:45, 29 April 2007 (EDT) | :Yeah, I'll change it. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 20:45, 29 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Cool, thanks. It's much less self-referential this way. [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 00:56, 30 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:02, 30 April 2007
Apparently many administrators don't like the frats and want to see them gone. Anyone know why? Reaganaut 15:07, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
- Town-Gown relations. The administrators see fraternities as little more than drinking clubs. Not to mention that the brownstones they occupy are incredibly expensive and it doesn't cost much more to live in them than it does to live in the dorms, so I believe they operate the buildings at a loss. WhatYouKnowAboutThat 01:02, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
Is there any way to make it so that Fraternities doesn't appear as an item on its own category page? Nonsensical 14:01, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
- Yeah, I'll change it. − Reaganaut 20:45, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
- Cool, thanks. It's much less self-referential this way. Nonsensical 00:56, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
