Difference between revisions of "Columbia.edu"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[Image:ColumbiaWebsite12-1996.jpg|thumb|240px|Columbia.edu in December 1996]] | ||
| + | [[Image:Cu-home-kermit.jpg|thumb|240px|Columbia.edu in 2003]] | ||
| + | |||
'''Columbia.edu''' is Columbia's domain name and home page. It was notoriously behind the times until a few years ago. | '''Columbia.edu''' is Columbia's domain name and home page. It was notoriously behind the times until a few years ago. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 9: | ||
==2003 Design== | ==2003 Design== | ||
| + | |||
In December 2003, Columbia launched a new version of its homepage. After soliciting feedback from various sources, the website designers produced a design that was largely unexpected by students who'd had input earlier in the process. [[University Senator]] Jennifer Schnidman [[Columbia College|CC]] '[[2006|06]] is quoted at the time as saying "We gave the designers a lot of feedback and ultimately the direction they chose to go in was something completely different than what we suggested," noting that student council members had approved a much more traditional design in terms of color, layout, graphics, and fonts. Frank Wolf, chair of the web advisory committee responded that "You can't design by committee. There are always going to be some people who want something tweaked." | In December 2003, Columbia launched a new version of its homepage. After soliciting feedback from various sources, the website designers produced a design that was largely unexpected by students who'd had input earlier in the process. [[University Senator]] Jennifer Schnidman [[Columbia College|CC]] '[[2006|06]] is quoted at the time as saying "We gave the designers a lot of feedback and ultimately the direction they chose to go in was something completely different than what we suggested," noting that student council members had approved a much more traditional design in terms of color, layout, graphics, and fonts. Frank Wolf, chair of the web advisory committee responded that "You can't design by committee. There are always going to be some people who want something tweaked." | ||
One particular criticism voiced by observers was that they had been shown designs with a blue backgrounds, and the website broke a cardinal rule of web design by using a stark white background instead. Designers at [[DKV]] noted that a strong consideration in choosing the background color of the page was how it would look when projected onto a screen at presentations to alumni. You know, as opposed to how aesthetically pleasing it would be to web surfers. | One particular criticism voiced by observers was that they had been shown designs with a blue backgrounds, and the website broke a cardinal rule of web design by using a stark white background instead. Designers at [[DKV]] noted that a strong consideration in choosing the background color of the page was how it would look when projected onto a screen at presentations to alumni. You know, as opposed to how aesthetically pleasing it would be to web surfers. | ||
| + | == History == | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* [http://www.columbia.edu/acis/history/cu-home-kermit.jpg Columbia.edu design 2000-2003] | * [http://www.columbia.edu/acis/history/cu-home-kermit.jpg Columbia.edu design 2000-2003] | ||
* [http://www.columbia.edu/acis/history/cuhome.html Columbia.edu design December 1996-2000] | * [http://www.columbia.edu/acis/history/cuhome.html Columbia.edu design December 1996-2000] | ||
Revision as of 10:42, 9 January 2010
Columbia.edu is Columbia's domain name and home page. It was notoriously behind the times until a few years ago.
The domain name was registered on July 5th, 1985, and the first servers for the domain were hooked up in September 1985.
You can submit photos for the slideshow to the webmasters, who may crop them and put them up.
2003 Design
In December 2003, Columbia launched a new version of its homepage. After soliciting feedback from various sources, the website designers produced a design that was largely unexpected by students who'd had input earlier in the process. University Senator Jennifer Schnidman CC '06 is quoted at the time as saying "We gave the designers a lot of feedback and ultimately the direction they chose to go in was something completely different than what we suggested," noting that student council members had approved a much more traditional design in terms of color, layout, graphics, and fonts. Frank Wolf, chair of the web advisory committee responded that "You can't design by committee. There are always going to be some people who want something tweaked."
One particular criticism voiced by observers was that they had been shown designs with a blue backgrounds, and the website broke a cardinal rule of web design by using a stark white background instead. Designers at DKV noted that a strong consideration in choosing the background color of the page was how it would look when projected onto a screen at presentations to alumni. You know, as opposed to how aesthetically pleasing it would be to web surfers.
