Difference between revisions of "Talk:Columbia Daily Spectator"
(New page: ==Broadsheet v. Tabloid== I don't think there's universal pro-tabloid sentiment. I like that the Spec looks as professional as a "real" paper like the NYT, or at least like the other Ivy ...) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I don't think there's universal pro-tabloid sentiment. I like that the Spec looks as professional as a "real" paper like the NYT, or at least like the other Ivy dailies. I shudder to remember what it was like back in 2003. [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 14:18, 10 May 2007 (EDT) | I don't think there's universal pro-tabloid sentiment. I like that the Spec looks as professional as a "real" paper like the NYT, or at least like the other Ivy dailies. I shudder to remember what it was like back in 2003. [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 14:18, 10 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :That's my tendency to editorialize shining through again! {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:41, 10 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:41, 10 May 2007
Broadsheet v. Tabloid
I don't think there's universal pro-tabloid sentiment. I like that the Spec looks as professional as a "real" paper like the NYT, or at least like the other Ivy dailies. I shudder to remember what it was like back in 2003. Pacman 14:18, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
- That's my tendency to editorialize shining through again! − Reaganaut 14:41, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
