Difference between revisions of "Talk:Coogan Brennan"
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
whoa. [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 01:03, 29 October 2007 (EDT) | whoa. [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 01:03, 29 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | |||
Very aggressive first entry from Mr. Brennan. I'd appreciate the ballsiness if it weren't for the fact that this seems to have nothing at all to do with Columbia. [[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] 13:28, 30 October 2007 (EDT) | Very aggressive first entry from Mr. Brennan. I'd appreciate the ballsiness if it weren't for the fact that this seems to have nothing at all to do with Columbia. [[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] 13:28, 30 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
'''Delete''': as [[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] notes, this has no link to columbia, AFAIK. [[User:Foobar|Foobar]] 18:52, 6 November 2007 (EST) | '''Delete''': as [[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] notes, this has no link to columbia, AFAIK. [[User:Foobar|Foobar]] 18:52, 6 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Hey, listen, I think it's a good page! My name was already linked to "Campus Characters" and I thought I would add some content. And it DOES have something to do with Columbia because I went to Columbia. also, I mention Six Silberman, a major undergraduate force for four years. [[User:CooganBrennan|CooganBrennan]] | ||
| + | :: No, it's not that good a page, and Columbia has too many alumni for presence of 2 alumni on a page to merit a page. [[User:Foobar|Foobar]] 15:02, 16 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Keep''': this kid's name comes up everywhere. I just wish the page were more informative. [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 15:10, 16 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Clarification''': I think we all want the same thing, which is collected information about Columbia. I don't want to step on anyone's toes, but I would appreciate a standards of protocol I could refer to know what people perceive as informative and noninformative information. [[User:CooganBrennan|CooganBrennan]] 3:24 19 November 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | :Coogan, you can now add "being notable enough for WikiCU" to your list of why dropping out was a good idea. [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 22:14, 2 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | :Fortune favors the bold, my friends. BOO YA! WASSSAAAAAPPPPPPPPPP [[User:CooganBrennan|CooganBrennan]] 4:46, 26 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:47, 26 January 2008
whoa. Pacman 01:03, 29 October 2007 (EDT)
Very aggressive first entry from Mr. Brennan. I'd appreciate the ballsiness if it weren't for the fact that this seems to have nothing at all to do with Columbia. WhatYouKnowAboutThat 13:28, 30 October 2007 (EDT)
Delete: as WhatYouKnowAboutThat notes, this has no link to columbia, AFAIK. Foobar 18:52, 6 November 2007 (EST)
- Hey, listen, I think it's a good page! My name was already linked to "Campus Characters" and I thought I would add some content. And it DOES have something to do with Columbia because I went to Columbia. also, I mention Six Silberman, a major undergraduate force for four years. CooganBrennan
- No, it's not that good a page, and Columbia has too many alumni for presence of 2 alumni on a page to merit a page. Foobar 15:02, 16 November 2007 (EST)
Keep: this kid's name comes up everywhere. I just wish the page were more informative. Pacman 15:10, 16 November 2007 (EST)
Clarification: I think we all want the same thing, which is collected information about Columbia. I don't want to step on anyone's toes, but I would appreciate a standards of protocol I could refer to know what people perceive as informative and noninformative information. CooganBrennan 3:24 19 November 2007 (PST)
- Coogan, you can now add "being notable enough for WikiCU" to your list of why dropping out was a good idea. Pacman 22:14, 2 December 2007 (EST)
- Fortune favors the bold, my friends. BOO YA! WASSSAAAAAPPPPPPPPPP CooganBrennan 4:46, 26 January 2008 (EST)
