Difference between revisions of "Talk:Senior Societies"

From WikiCU
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
The administrators quickly restored order and banned the members.
 
The administrators quickly restored order and banned the members.
  
Of course, pulling something as stupid as this (Daniel Okin's AIM is '''Tokin84''' and Michelle Diamond's UNI is '''mnd2102''') on a Wiki doesn't answer the question of whether they want secrecy or attention more.
+
Of course, pulling something as stupid as this on a Wiki doesn't answer the question of whether they want secrecy or attention more.
  
 
== Temporary block on Senior Socities, Nacoms, Sachems ==
 
== Temporary block on Senior Socities, Nacoms, Sachems ==
  
 
These articles do not cite their sources. I am blocking edits until discussions on their talk pages are resolved. [[User:Admin|Admin]] 15:19, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 
These articles do not cite their sources. I am blocking edits until discussions on their talk pages are resolved. [[User:Admin|Admin]] 15:19, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:07, 1 April 2007

  • this is kind of hilarious. Good effort guys. wang 03:05, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
  • who cares? there's been way too much press about them lately @ bwog. Foobar 07:36, 1 April 2007 (EDT)


Info temporarily moved to this talk page

Vandalism attempts of 1 April 07

Shortly after midnight on 1 April 2007, after a partial list of members for the Sachems and Nacoms was created, WikiCU was hit by a seemingly coordinated vandalism attack by their members. The initial attack was at least kind of intelligent: Nacoms member Daniel Okin (Tokin84) and an unidentified user with a just-created account (RedLabel) first deleted all content from the pages, and then redirected the societies' pages to each other, creating an infinite redirect loop. Good SEAS thinking there!

About half an hour later, Sachems member Michelle Diamond (Mnd2102) stepped in and tried just deleting pages.

The administrators quickly restored order and banned the members.

Of course, pulling something as stupid as this on a Wiki doesn't answer the question of whether they want secrecy or attention more.

Temporary block on Senior Socities, Nacoms, Sachems

These articles do not cite their sources. I am blocking edits until discussions on their talk pages are resolved. Admin 15:19, 1 April 2007 (EDT)