Difference between revisions of "WikiCU talk:About"
Nonsensical (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
You're totally right, WikiCU is much better that CUWiki. CUWiki is my project - I started it about halfway through the spring term 2007 knowing very, very little about the Mediawiki software. I put in all the Cornell pages from wikipedia thinking that they'd be a good test setup. My intention is that those pages will remain and get updated from wikipedia once in a while, and new Cornell pages will be added that are locally relevant. Check back in the fall! [[User:Opakapaka|Opakapaka]] 10:50, 11 May 2007 (EDT) | You're totally right, WikiCU is much better that CUWiki. CUWiki is my project - I started it about halfway through the spring term 2007 knowing very, very little about the Mediawiki software. I put in all the Cornell pages from wikipedia thinking that they'd be a good test setup. My intention is that those pages will remain and get updated from wikipedia once in a while, and new Cornell pages will be added that are locally relevant. Check back in the fall! [[User:Opakapaka|Opakapaka]] 10:50, 11 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Psst, Reaganaut, I think he heard what you said about CUWiki... ''Awkward!'' [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 17:37, 11 May 2007 (EDT) | :Psst, Reaganaut, I think he heard what you said about CUWiki... ''Awkward!'' [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 17:37, 11 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Indeed... time to ban off-campus IPs... or not. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 22:24, 11 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Cool, it's good to know you're working on it. I would suggest creating some new articles from the ground-up. That's what got WikiCU going - about 100 articles of original content. Only then will people come to the site for info and hopefully contribute some of their own knowledge. Good luck! I'll be interested to watch your site grow. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 12:11, 11 May 2007 (EDT) | Cool, it's good to know you're working on it. I would suggest creating some new articles from the ground-up. That's what got WikiCU going - about 100 articles of original content. Only then will people come to the site for info and hopefully contribute some of their own knowledge. Good luck! I'll be interested to watch your site grow. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 12:11, 11 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:24, 11 May 2007
I have to say that writing WikiCU from the ground up has resulted in a much better wiki than this one about Cornell, where the only active editor seems to have copied a great deal of material from Wikipedia. Take just one totally random example: Alexander Hamilton versus Ezra Cornell. Reaganaut 05:34, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
You're totally right, WikiCU is much better that CUWiki. CUWiki is my project - I started it about halfway through the spring term 2007 knowing very, very little about the Mediawiki software. I put in all the Cornell pages from wikipedia thinking that they'd be a good test setup. My intention is that those pages will remain and get updated from wikipedia once in a while, and new Cornell pages will be added that are locally relevant. Check back in the fall! Opakapaka 10:50, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
- Psst, Reaganaut, I think he heard what you said about CUWiki... Awkward! Nonsensical 17:37, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
- Indeed... time to ban off-campus IPs... or not. − Reaganaut 22:24, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
Cool, it's good to know you're working on it. I would suggest creating some new articles from the ground-up. That's what got WikiCU going - about 100 articles of original content. Only then will people come to the site for info and hopefully contribute some of their own knowledge. Good luck! I'll be interested to watch your site grow. − Reaganaut 12:11, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
