Difference between revisions of "WikiCU talk:WikiCU is not Wikipedia"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So... what ''is'' WikiCU, then? Can we start making an explicit policy guide? [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 18:54, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | So... what ''is'' WikiCU, then? Can we start making an explicit policy guide? [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 18:54, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
: Rather not, I think bureaucracy and wikipedia are both dreadful. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 19:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | : Rather not, I think bureaucracy and wikipedia are both dreadful. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 19:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | : Hmm, what is WikiCU? It's [[w:Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not/Outtakes|not a sexual lubricant]]. On a more serious note, feel free to write an article about what it ''is''. The best definition is probably "[[WikiCU is a guide to Columbia]]", similar but not identical to "[[w:Wikipedia:Wikipedia is an encyclopedia|Wikipedia is an encyclopedia]]". Otherwise, I agree with Feinstein that we don't need or want too many officious policy articles. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 19:19, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:19, 2 May 2007
So... what is WikiCU, then? Can we start making an explicit policy guide? Nonsensical 18:54, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
- Rather not, I think bureaucracy and wikipedia are both dreadful. Feinstein 19:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
- Hmm, what is WikiCU? It's not a sexual lubricant. On a more serious note, feel free to write an article about what it is. The best definition is probably "WikiCU is a guide to Columbia", similar but not identical to "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia". Otherwise, I agree with Feinstein that we don't need or want too many officious policy articles. − Reaganaut 19:19, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
