Difference between revisions of "Lit Hum exam leak (2013)"
Absentminded (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==See also== | ||
| + | *[[Lit Hum exam leak]] | ||
==External Links== | ==External Links== | ||
| Line 17: | Line 20: | ||
* [http://www.wikicu.com/images/b/b0/140699233-Lit-Hum-Passages.pdf Lupic's "study guide," also obtained by Spec] | * [http://www.wikicu.com/images/b/b0/140699233-Lit-Hum-Passages.pdf Lupic's "study guide," also obtained by Spec] | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Academic scandals]] |
[[Category:Core Curriculum]] | [[Category:Core Curriculum]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:52, 8 December 2013
The 2013 Lit Hum exam leak (not to be confused with previous Lit Hum exam leaks) took place in Spring 2013. Instructor Ivan Lupic gave his class the IDs ahead of time. They were shared on Facebook and via email well before the exam.
Results: Chair of Lit Hum Gareth Williams discounted the ID section for the every section of Lit Hum[1]. And Lupic shared a statement with campus media that was fairly badass and very sophistic[2].
Lupic is Stanford-bound; he has an appointment beginning in the fall of 2013[3].
