Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mike Ren"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: I thought we scrapped any notability policy and decided to let vanity pages flourish? There aren't that many of them. [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 00:08, 2 December 2009 (EST) | : I thought we scrapped any notability policy and decided to let vanity pages flourish? There aren't that many of them. [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 00:08, 2 December 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | having no idea what a fu foundation scholar is, i'm going to delete it. lernerhall/mike ren, i invite you to back it up.[[Special:Contributions/98.14.228.83|98.14.228.83]] 13:50, 6 December 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | secondly, at wcu deleting content w/o some explanation is grounds for getting you blocked. what's up w/deleting the year, mike?[[Special:Contributions/98.14.228.83|98.14.228.83]] 13:50, 6 December 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 14:50, 6 December 2009
what is a "fu foundation scholar"? there is no reference to it on columbia's webpage: so sayeth google
also this looks like a vanity page with no wikicu interest/wikiworthiness. lernerhall should spend his time on a linkedin.com page or other self-page rather than a wikicu ego page.
- I thought we scrapped any notability policy and decided to let vanity pages flourish? There aren't that many of them. Pacman 00:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)
having no idea what a fu foundation scholar is, i'm going to delete it. lernerhall/mike ren, i invite you to back it up.98.14.228.83 13:50, 6 December 2009 (EST)
secondly, at wcu deleting content w/o some explanation is grounds for getting you blocked. what's up w/deleting the year, mike?98.14.228.83 13:50, 6 December 2009 (EST)
