Difference between revisions of "Talk:History of student housing"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Where the hell did you dig this up? [[User:Ttan|Ttan]] 06:03, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | Where the hell did you dig this up? [[User:Ttan|Ttan]] 06:03, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
:From the housing primer on The Student Guide to Columbia. [[User:Admin|Admin]] 13:04, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | :From the housing primer on The Student Guide to Columbia. [[User:Admin|Admin]] 13:04, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Wait a minute- Hartley hall can't have been the firs undertaking to house students at a university. McCaughey clearly states that Columbia's commuter status was a major difference between it and other colonial-era founded schools. The Harkness money in 1929 went towards completing the house and res college systems, not starting them. Correct? Similarly, Princeton is now completing its res college system with the construction of a new college. [[User:205.134.0.81|205.134.0.81]] 13:21, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:21, 22 March 2007
Where the hell did you dig this up? Ttan 06:03, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
- From the housing primer on The Student Guide to Columbia. Admin 13:04, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- Wait a minute- Hartley hall can't have been the firs undertaking to house students at a university. McCaughey clearly states that Columbia's commuter status was a major difference between it and other colonial-era founded schools. The Harkness money in 1929 went towards completing the house and res college systems, not starting them. Correct? Similarly, Princeton is now completing its res college system with the construction of a new college. 205.134.0.81 13:21, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
