Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Legends of Furnald 6"
Nateoxford (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I dunno. On the one hand, it's foolish and "smells of buffoonery," as Dostoevsky would put it. On the other hand, it's harmless and does lend an air of candidness to Wikicu which differentiates it from Wikipedia. Just my two cents. [[User:Nateoxford|Nateoxford]] 06:08, 7 December 2009 (EST) | I dunno. On the one hand, it's foolish and "smells of buffoonery," as Dostoevsky would put it. On the other hand, it's harmless and does lend an air of candidness to Wikicu which differentiates it from Wikipedia. Just my two cents. [[User:Nateoxford|Nateoxford]] 06:08, 7 December 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Did we ever decide if this would be deleted? If we leave it, it means we'd have to leave any future "story" articles that are posted. Precedent scares me :-\ [[User:Cam2171|cam2171]] 14:51, 26 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:51, 26 July 2010
WikiCU editors: Delete this shit or let it go crazy? Pacman 21:40, 6 December 2009 (EST)
Agreed. This is starting to get out of hand. cam2171 20:26, 6 December 2009 (EST)
I dunno. On the one hand, it's foolish and "smells of buffoonery," as Dostoevsky would put it. On the other hand, it's harmless and does lend an air of candidness to Wikicu which differentiates it from Wikipedia. Just my two cents. Nateoxford 06:08, 7 December 2009 (EST)
Did we ever decide if this would be deleted? If we leave it, it means we'd have to leave any future "story" articles that are posted. Precedent scares me :-\ cam2171 14:51, 26 July 2010 (EDT)
